6 Comments to “Reflections on the murder of Salman Taseer”

  1. Hamza Balouch(@H_Bal

    Jan 4th, 2012

    Few points are wrongly mentioned here.

    Asia Bibi crime was proved from the court after 2 and half year trail(as far as i Know). Where was he during this duration?

    When court gave here the punishment, that ST released that she is innocent? and 1st step he did was the press conference, and said that she is innocent,was not contempt of court? Than after that all of his press conference, rather than stopping the support of "Criminal" he start speaking against Blasphemy law..

    Misuse of the blasphemy law… How? no one get punishment under this law. Yes,misuse in this since, that even "criminal" got free through this law…!!

    • Ali Abbas

      Jan 4th, 2012

      1) Misuse of blasphemy law – Godra Gaon massacre, people in jail being "murdered". If they are in jail it is the responsibility of law to execute them not the public.
      2) Asia Bibi was sentenced, then ST raised voice. It has been 2 years since the sentence and the verdict has been challenged in the court. Decision is pending.
      3) If there was contempt of court, ST should have been tried for it.
      4) Nothing can justify the actions of Mumtaz Qadri.

  2. Hamza Balouch(@H_Bal

    Jan 4th, 2012

    1) Thats is the the problem of blasphemy law, that law an order issue. Blasphemy law did not asked people to kill them nor allowed police to allow people to kill those blasphemers.

    2) As far as,i Know no case verdict is challenged for asia bibi in any case. When there are higher courts, than at least govt servants need to use courts, not press or media.

    3) Certianly not, and this the reason which few people say Mumtaz done right,as in Pakistan, high profile people get easily free from courts… What you say about those voices? You support those voice just as you support ST voice… as its fact the law and judges are "mis useD" for elite class.

    4) No one saying that Mumtaz qadri done was right. People supporting Mumtaz qadari just there are people who supporting Asia bibi(llike what ST done)…. Using publlic in both is wrong. there are courts, better to use court for someone if some one says that he or she is not a "criminal".

  3. Khurram Ali

    Mar 14th, 2012

    yehi tou almiaa hai hamara…. we have MOLVIS everywhere… and only few real scholars…

    if you analyze the laws… there are two kind of laws, substantive laws and procedural laws.

    substantive laws belongs to PPC (pakistan penal code) and procedural laws belong to (criminal procedural code or something)

    the penal code book contains the definition of all crimes and punishment for that…

    like.. what the 'murder' by definition is.. and wats the punishment for that…

    and the other book, the procedural one, contains the procedure from FIR to all proceedings for that case… like for a murder case, who will put the FIR, how it will be processed till the end…

    SALMAN TASEER was conflicting with THIS procedural law… NOT with the penal code… not with the law… k gustaakh should be punished or not…

    Qazi ayyaz R.A., Mulla ali qari R.A., Allama Khifaji R.A. has been great sufis of Islam… and Qazi ayyaz R.A. is famous among sufis for his ishq-e-rasool s.a.w…

    these molvis shud look at wat dey said about gustaakh-e-rasool.. who really IS gustaakh e rasool S.A.W.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Ekngk0qMcA

    and for these ppl… these procedural laws… the Criminal Procedural COde… which salman taseer was against… have been created by 'angraiz'.. these are not even created by muslims…

  4. syedzeehasham

    Mar 23rd, 2013

    people of such a black and barbarian mindset are all around us…sighs…:/


Leave a Reply

  • Archives

    Recent Comments

Get Adobe Flash player